The Federal Reserve Board of Governers will meet this week to vote on the level of the all-important federal funds rate. The federal funds rate is the overnight rate at which banks can lend federal funds to one another. By law, depository institutions, such as banks, are required to maintain a certain level of reserves with the Fed. A bank's level of reserves will vary day by day as its customers deposit and withdraw money. When a particular bank falls short of the required reserves, for whatever reason, they'll have to borrow funds from another bank with excess money. The rate they borrow at is the federal funds rate.
The Fed's goal in setting the rate is to achieve consistent economic growth, while at the same time controlling inflation. On the growth side, the fed will consider US manufacturing, which recently has stagnated; consumer spending, which in June fell as oil and food prices have risen; continued weakness in credit facilities; and a deeper housing contraction.
On the inflation side it's all about energy and oil prices, which in the past few weeks have seen major price contractions, since reaching all time highs. The Consumer Price Index, which tracks the prices of goods in the US continues to be relatively high due in part to high energy and transportation costs.
It's a fine line that the Fed has to walk, sustaining growth while keeping inflation in check. Most analysts are expecting the fed to keep rates steady at 2.00%. The risks of inflation still are heavily outweighed by the sluggish economy. However, we can expect the Fed to increase their inflation rhetoric, as the CPI rose 1.1% in June, the biggest gain since September of 2005, and energy prices remain relatively high.
I expect that any increase in inflation language will cause the dollar to strengthen and oil to weaken. Remember that since oil is denominated in dollars, its price acts as a hedge against a weakening dollar and vice versa. So if the fed hints that they'll raise rates in the future, the dollar is likely to get a short term boost, and oil will go down. You can gain exposure to a strengthening dollar through the PowerShares DB U.S. Dollar Bullish Fund, UUP, and to oil through the US Oil Fund ETF, USO.
I currently have no positions in any of the funds mentioned in this article.
BACKGROUND
It’s now 2008, and the Credit Crisis is in full swing. Money is hard to get no matter if you’re just an individual looking to buy a home or if you’re a massive corporation looking to restructure your debt. This tightening of credit has caused the U.S. Economy to practically stop growing. As a consequence more and more people are being laid off each week, homes are languishing on the market, foreclosures are rising, there are runs on banks, and no one is quite sure when it will end.
To understand what is happening we have to go back to the beginning, to the start of the great bull market in real estate, which coincided with the beginning of the millennium.
REAL ESTATE
From the end of the 90s to the middle of the first decade of the new millennium, the real estate market in the U.S. was booming. Financial innovations had occurred that brought in new participants to the market. Everyone was buying, and everyone was making money.
Investors on Wall Street were flooding the credit markets, eager to get their hands on high returns. Banks were loose in their lending practices, giving loans that required little or no money down. It wasn’t a problem, since by the time the homeowner would have moved in the house would have gained tens of thousands in value.
On top of all this, interest rates were at historical lows following the events of 9-11. By June 2003, Alan Greenspan, the then Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, had lowered the Federal Funds rate to 1%.
Everyone wanted to be a homeowner and get a piece of the action as home prices kept skyrocketing. Like every speculative bubble, this one had people thinking it would never end. Land is finite, they reasoned, and the population can only grow.
MORTGAGES AND MONEY
There was a lot of money to be made in Real Estate. If a bank required you to put nothing down, the only cash out of your pocket would be closing costs. Suppose, during this time you bought a 4 bedroom 2200 sq. ft. home in Pennsylvania with no money down for $250,000. Let’s say the closing costs were in the neighborhood of $9,000, and after 1 year you resold the home for $300,000. Even after paying the realtors $18,000 for their cut, you still had $32,000. That’s a 255% return in one year! You put in $9000, you get back $32,000, which means a profit of $23,000.
Flipping became a pastime. It was common for investors to sell the contract of sale before they even got to closing. The Florida and California markets were particularly good at this.
The banks were more than eager to keep lending because the investors on Wall Street were hungry for anything giving above average returns. So long as Wall Street was willing to buy those loans from the banks, the banks kept issuing more.
Ultimately, the flow of money attracted the brightest minds on the Street and innovation in the forms of exotic derivatives based on mortgages followed.
COLLATERALIZED DEBT OBLIGATIONS
Enter the Collateralized Debt Obligation, the infamous CDO. You can think of a CDO as an income stream. By investing in a piece of a CDO you’re essentially getting a stream of income at some predetermined rate. The higher the rate, the riskier the stream is.
To understand what a CDO is you have to start with the homeowner. All mortgages originate at the retail level, when a buyer takes out a loan to buy a home. Let’s use Wells Fargo as an example, since they are the commercial bank that originated my loan. Wells Fargo lends out money to thousands of homebuyers, but Wells Fargo doesn’t have an infinite amount of money, so at some point they have to sell those loans.
Say we have 1,000 loans of varying profiles, some went to people with good credit (prime loans), some went to people with bad credit (subprime loans). Wells would then resell all 1,000 loans on the secondary market, usually to one of the government backed agencies, like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would pay Wells Fargo for the loans, so that Wells now had more money to loan and create new mortgages. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would bundle these loans by type, and resell these bundles as asset backed securities to investors on Wall Street.
Now Wall Street doesn’t make money by buying and holding. They make money by reselling and charging a fee. The clever investment banks, for example Bear Stearns, bought mortgages from the government backed agencies and repackaged them into CDOs. So you can see what a CDO is, it’s just a bunch of bundled mortgages. But the structure of the CDO is where the real financial engineering occurred.
You can think of a bundle of mortgages as a stream of income. What the investment banks did was to divide the income stream into different segments or tranches. As money would come in each month, the top tranche would be paid first. This top tranche would have the lowest return, but was the safest. The bottom tranches would be paid last and therefore were exposed to the most risk (so when a subprime borrower defaulted, the bottom tranches would be out of luck). But those bottom tranches also had the highest returns.
Unfortunately no one really wanted those bottom tranches, because they were essentially made up of the worst loans out there. Remember this was a time when people with no jobs, assets, or income could get a loan. So the banks created hedge funds that used borrowed money to buy these risky tranches. You can see where this is going.
By leveraging, (borrowing money), to fund these hedge funds, the banks amplified the potential losses. Moreover, these funds had wonderful names like the High Yield Credit Fund, so that investors would buy into them.
Things started coming to a end in terms of easy money towards the beginning of 2007, by the middle of that summer, Bear Stearns became the first to report losses as two of their funds went bankrupt.
Those funds were just the tip of the iceberg. What would follow would be a drying up of credit which would affect every American.
STAY ON TOP OF THE NEWS
So this is the environment that we find ourselves. Tight credit and risk averse investors and prevail. Now that we now how we got here we can figure a way to get out. Stay tuned…
It’s now 2008, and the Credit Crisis is in full swing. Money is hard to get no matter if you’re just an individual looking to buy a home or if you’re a massive corporation looking to restructure your debt. This tightening of credit has caused the U.S. Economy to practically stop growing. As a consequence more and more people are being laid off each week, homes are languishing on the market, foreclosures are rising, there are runs on banks, and no one is quite sure when it will end.
To understand what is happening we have to go back to the beginning, to the start of the great bull market in real estate, which coincided with the beginning of the millennium.
REAL ESTATE
From the end of the 90s to the middle of the first decade of the new millennium, the real estate market in the U.S. was booming. Financial innovations had occurred that brought in new participants to the market. Everyone was buying, and everyone was making money.
Investors on Wall Street were flooding the credit markets, eager to get their hands on high returns. Banks were loose in their lending practices, giving loans that required little or no money down. It wasn’t a problem, since by the time the homeowner would have moved in the house would have gained tens of thousands in value.
On top of all this, interest rates were at historical lows following the events of 9-11. By June 2003, Alan Greenspan, the then Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, had lowered the Federal Funds rate to 1%.
Everyone wanted to be a homeowner and get a piece of the action as home prices kept skyrocketing. Like every speculative bubble, this one had people thinking it would never end. Land is finite, they reasoned, and the population can only grow.
MORTGAGES AND MONEY
There was a lot of money to be made in Real Estate. If a bank required you to put nothing down, the only cash out of your pocket would be closing costs. Suppose, during this time you bought a 4 bedroom 2200 sq. ft. home in Pennsylvania with no money down for $250,000. Let’s say the closing costs were in the neighborhood of $9,000, and after 1 year you resold the home for $300,000. Even after paying the realtors $18,000 for their cut, you still had $32,000. That’s a 255% return in one year! You put in $9000, you get back $32,000, which means a profit of $23,000.
Flipping became a pastime. It was common for investors to sell the contract of sale before they even got to closing. The Florida and California markets were particularly good at this.
The banks were more than eager to keep lending because the investors on Wall Street were hungry for anything giving above average returns. So long as Wall Street was willing to buy those loans from the banks, the banks kept issuing more.
Ultimately, the flow of money attracted the brightest minds on the Street and innovation in the forms of exotic derivatives based on mortgages followed.
COLLATERALIZED DEBT OBLIGATIONS
Enter the Collateralized Debt Obligation, the infamous CDO. You can think of a CDO as an income stream. By investing in a piece of a CDO you’re essentially getting a stream of income at some predetermined rate. The higher the rate, the riskier the stream is.
To understand what a CDO is you have to start with the homeowner. All mortgages originate at the retail level, when a buyer takes out a loan to buy a home. Let’s use Wells Fargo as an example, since they are the commercial bank that originated my loan. Wells Fargo lends out money to thousands of homebuyers, but Wells Fargo doesn’t have an infinite amount of money, so at some point they have to sell those loans.
Say we have 1,000 loans of varying profiles, some went to people with good credit (prime loans), some went to people with bad credit (subprime loans). Wells would then resell all 1,000 loans on the secondary market, usually to one of the government backed agencies, like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would pay Wells Fargo for the loans, so that Wells now had more money to loan and create new mortgages. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would bundle these loans by type, and resell these bundles as asset backed securities to investors on Wall Street.
Now Wall Street doesn’t make money by buying and holding. They make money by reselling and charging a fee. The clever investment banks, for example Bear Stearns, bought mortgages from the government backed agencies and repackaged them into CDOs. So you can see what a CDO is, it’s just a bunch of bundled mortgages. But the structure of the CDO is where the real financial engineering occurred.
You can think of a bundle of mortgages as a stream of income. What the investment banks did was to divide the income stream into different segments or tranches. As money would come in each month, the top tranche would be paid first. This top tranche would have the lowest return, but was the safest. The bottom tranches would be paid last and therefore were exposed to the most risk (so when a subprime borrower defaulted, the bottom tranches would be out of luck). But those bottom tranches also had the highest returns.
Unfortunately no one really wanted those bottom tranches, because they were essentially made up of the worst loans out there. Remember this was a time when people with no jobs, assets, or income could get a loan. So the banks created hedge funds that used borrowed money to buy these risky tranches. You can see where this is going.
By leveraging, (borrowing money), to fund these hedge funds, the banks amplified the potential losses. Moreover, these funds had wonderful names like the High Yield Credit Fund, so that investors would buy into them.
Things started coming to a end in terms of easy money towards the beginning of 2007, by the middle of that summer, Bear Stearns became the first to report losses as two of their funds went bankrupt.
Those funds were just the tip of the iceberg. What would follow would be a drying up of credit which would affect every American.
STAY ON TOP OF THE NEWS
So this is the environment that we find ourselves. Tight credit and risk averse investors and prevail. Now that we now how we got here we can figure a way to get out. Stay tuned…
Monday, August 4, 2008
Friday, August 1, 2008
Housing Bottom and Home Builders
Sorry folks for the lull in writing. I was taking the NY bar exam this week.
So we are nearing the 1 year anniversary of the official start of the Credit Crunch. Big news this week as Merrill Lynch continued to write off and sell of subprime sludge. Are they out of the woods yet? Definitely not. If you've been reading this blog, you'll know what I'm talking about. We won't see an end to this Credit Crisis until we see a bottom in the housing market.
Speaking of the housing market, D.R. Horton and Pulte home continue building up inventory. According to the Phoenix Business Journal, D.R. Horton started 2132 homes in the Pheonix area during the first six months of the year, and Pulte started 1764! I think these builders are gambling that we've hit bottom.
And its a big gamble, but for the big builders there's no choice, they have to keep money flowing in however they can. If we're not at the bottom, these builders and all those who keep adding inventory may very well be in trouble. Remember, right now, there's almost a 1 year inventory of homes on the market, and there's arguably little sign that the number will improve any time soon.
I still have a short position in DHI, and I'm sticking to it.
So we are nearing the 1 year anniversary of the official start of the Credit Crunch. Big news this week as Merrill Lynch continued to write off and sell of subprime sludge. Are they out of the woods yet? Definitely not. If you've been reading this blog, you'll know what I'm talking about. We won't see an end to this Credit Crisis until we see a bottom in the housing market.
Speaking of the housing market, D.R. Horton and Pulte home continue building up inventory. According to the Phoenix Business Journal, D.R. Horton started 2132 homes in the Pheonix area during the first six months of the year, and Pulte started 1764! I think these builders are gambling that we've hit bottom.
And its a big gamble, but for the big builders there's no choice, they have to keep money flowing in however they can. If we're not at the bottom, these builders and all those who keep adding inventory may very well be in trouble. Remember, right now, there's almost a 1 year inventory of homes on the market, and there's arguably little sign that the number will improve any time soon.
I still have a short position in DHI, and I'm sticking to it.
Labels:
Anniversary,
Builders,
Credit Crunch,
D.R. Horton,
Merrill,
Pulte
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Analysis of the Housing Bill
The Emergency Housing Bill has made it through Congress. Will this be what’s needed to turn the Real Estate Market? Here are some important points about the legislation:
The Housing Bill will further curtail the number of foreclosures by setting aside $300 billion to help troubled homeowners with existing exotic mortgages. Many commercial lenders already have been aggressively working with homeowners since the summer of 2007 to prevent foreclosures through the renegotiation of their mortgages. It’s estimated that since that time 1.7 million foreclosures have been avoided through these efforts. Was government intervention really needed, when the market participants were already doing this? Especially since signs of a bottom, at least in the West, were already forming.
The Bill increases the maximum cap on the national debt by $800 billion to $10.6 trillion. In addition, Treasury essentially has been given a blank check to bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac if needed. What does all this mean in terms of the strength of the dollar? I think the dollar is going to weaken as a result. Ultimately, the US government/ taxpayers are going to eat whatever losses come out of the Real Estate Market from here on out.
I do think that the immediate impact on the financial markets will be large gains in the Dow on Monday. Especially where commercial banks are concerned. Builders such as DHI, HOV, PUL, etc... will probably go up as well.
Note: I currently have a short position in DHI and will likely continue despite this bill.
The Housing Bill will further curtail the number of foreclosures by setting aside $300 billion to help troubled homeowners with existing exotic mortgages. Many commercial lenders already have been aggressively working with homeowners since the summer of 2007 to prevent foreclosures through the renegotiation of their mortgages. It’s estimated that since that time 1.7 million foreclosures have been avoided through these efforts. Was government intervention really needed, when the market participants were already doing this? Especially since signs of a bottom, at least in the West, were already forming.
The Bill increases the maximum cap on the national debt by $800 billion to $10.6 trillion. In addition, Treasury essentially has been given a blank check to bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac if needed. What does all this mean in terms of the strength of the dollar? I think the dollar is going to weaken as a result. Ultimately, the US government/ taxpayers are going to eat whatever losses come out of the Real Estate Market from here on out.
I do think that the immediate impact on the financial markets will be large gains in the Dow on Monday. Especially where commercial banks are concerned. Builders such as DHI, HOV, PUL, etc... will probably go up as well.
Note: I currently have a short position in DHI and will likely continue despite this bill.
Friday, July 25, 2008
Banks and the Discount Window
The Discount Window is the Federal Reserve's emergency lending mechanism. It's a good thing it exists, especially during a credit crunch like we have today. If the Fed wasn't there to provide banks liquidity, we'd literally see the financial system fall apart.
Commercial banks have borrowed more than 16 billion dollars a day this past week, a record amount. Because of the collapse of Bear Stearns, the Fed has also allowed investment banks to borrow as well, however, this past week investment bank borrowing was nil. Keep in mind these are short term loans that need to be paid back, either through more borrowing or if the banks have made enough money by paying them off. (Note the current rate at the discount window is 2.25%)
Commercial banks have borrowed more than 16 billion dollars a day this past week, a record amount. Because of the collapse of Bear Stearns, the Fed has also allowed investment banks to borrow as well, however, this past week investment bank borrowing was nil. Keep in mind these are short term loans that need to be paid back, either through more borrowing or if the banks have made enough money by paying them off. (Note the current rate at the discount window is 2.25%)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

